That unscripted second has taken on outsized political significance within the months since, held up for instance of Biden’s negotiating prowess and his dedication to the social security web.
However amongst Democrats bracing for a decent 2024 contest, some now need him to go additional.
Progressives have pitched Biden officers and Democratic leaders in current months on endorsing a plan to broaden People’ Social Safety advantages, in keeping with a number of individuals concerned within the casual discussions.
The proposal, they argue, could be broadly standard with an voters that ranks Social Safety among the many prime points they care deeply about, particularly amongst seniors extra more likely to vote. And after Republicans swore off cuts — in the meanwhile — it might enable Biden to stake out a brand new distinction with the GOP, one portray him as extra supportive of the cherished social insurance coverage program.
“The one weak point that Democrats have on their Social Safety insurance policies shouldn’t be sufficient individuals know that it’s them,” mentioned Alex Lawson, govt director of Social Safety Works, one of many teams advocating for the concept. “The best way to get Republicans much more on the again foot about their plans to chop Social Safety is to attract that extremely clear distinction that Democrats need to broaden, Republicans need to minimize.”
Biden embraced Social Safety growth throughout the 2020 Democratic main, proposing to spice up advantages for the lowest-income retirees and shore up Social Safety’s essential belief fund by elevating taxes on these making $400,000 or extra a yr. However confronted with slim congressional majorities as soon as he took workplace, Biden largely dropped the concept.
Three years later, progressive teams need him to revisit it, partly as a result of the candidate he’s more likely to face, Donald Trump, has publicly insisted he doesn’t need to minimize entitlement applications (despite the fact that he beforehand backed such insurance policies).
Polling offered this fall to prime White Home officers and different main Democrats by the Progressive Change Marketing campaign Committee and Information for Progress discovered simply 41 p.c trusted Biden greater than Trump to safeguard Social Safety advantages. Greater than 4 in 10 have been additionally skeptical that Republican candidates who had known as for slicing advantages or elevating the retirement age would observe by on it if elected.
Biden officers have expressed openness to the case for profit expansions, Lawson and others who talked with them mentioned, although the marketing campaign remains to be early within the means of constructing out a 2024 coverage platform and stays noncommittal on the concept.
“Donald Trump, Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis and the remainder of the MAGA Republicans have repeatedly campaigned on gutting Social Safety and Medicare and have the data to again it up,” marketing campaign spokesperson Ammar Moussa mentioned in a press release. “Joe Biden is not going to let that occur, and we’ll make sure the hundreds of thousands of People who’ve paid for Social Safety their complete lives now that once they head to vote subsequent November.”
There’s skepticism amongst some within the president’s orbit who say Biden’s message on defending advantages versus Republicans in search of cuts is already properly established. They query whether or not including a model new thought to the combination would confuse issues. The president can be already planning to run on a slew of concrete accomplishments that will imply extra to voters than aspirational concepts like Social Safety growth.
And as Democrats are wont to do, some have gotten caught up within the underlying coverage specifics. They warn the celebration would want to settle debates over which retirees would profit, and finally how the whole factor could be paid for. Along with Biden’s 2020 proposal, a number of lawmakers — together with Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) — had longstanding growth plans of their very own.
“They in all probability don’t need to open that may of worms,” mentioned Dean Baker, a progressive economist who has lengthy supported increasing Social Safety.
The progressive teams pushing for Social Safety growth aren’t lobbying for a selected proposal. However they do have a solution for find out how to pay for the advantages: Taxing the rich.
“It simply actually places all the items in place, and you’ll’t muddy it up,” mentioned Lawson. “Tax the rich extra with a view to improve Social Safety advantages. Electorally, it is a Democratic wedge concern.”
Like this content material? Contemplate signing up for POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook e-newsletter.
