A brand new assortment of essays referred to as Battle on Ukraine, edited by Hal Manufacturers, and revealed by Johns Hopkins College press, marks the two-year anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. It covers all facets of the struggle from its origins to its conduct, to the impression of financial sanctions and the function of China. It’s a terrific useful resource, with wonderful chapters, and will be downloaded free of charge.
My very own contribution to it considers Vladimir Putin as a “strategic fanatic”, reflecting his persistent fixation with Ukraine and tendency, when confronted with the dire penalties of every determination, to double down within the hope that much more excessive measures will give him the end result he seeks. That is extra than simply being a nasty strategist. There are actually parts of this – underestimation of the enemy, over-reliance on hunches about how others will act, and never considering via the doubtless results of a plan of action. Fanaticism goes past this. To cite myself:
“It’s a refusal to just accept that the issue as framed can’t be solved, a sample of error that stems from obsession and a readiness to go to extraordinary lengths to fulfill that obsession, at the same time as satisfaction stays elusive. Dictionary definitions of a fanatic consult with somebody with excessive beliefs that make them behave in unreasonable methods. Putin’s fixation with Ukraine, nearly as quickly as he started his second stint as president in 2012, has led to calamitous errors of strategic judgement.”
It’s doable to observe the event of Putin’s Ukraine coverage from the second he took energy on the flip of the century, via Ukraine’s Orange Revolution of 2004-05, after which the extra aggressive flip as soon as he returned to the Russian presidency in 2012. He has been constant. He needs Ukraine to be firmly within the Russian sphere of affect with a supine authorities. His fallback place, when that appears out of attain, is to encourage the fragmentation of Ukraine, with contiguous items of land acquired for the Russian Federation. This secondary goal contradicts the primary, because it encourages Ukraine to show much more to the West for help and safety.
One can return deep into historical past to discover the origins of the battle, as Putin usually does, however start line to know how we bought to the place we’re is the summer season of 2013. That is when Putin determined to place an financial squeeze on Ukraine to discourage its authorities from signing an affiliation settlement with the EU, reflecting his dedication to forestall Ukraine falling right into a Western sphere of affect. Nato membership was not on the desk presently. In truth Ukraine’s then-president, Viktor Yanukovych, was as pro-Russian as Putin was ever going to get. Nonetheless this singular act of independence led to him being utterly undermined by blatant coercion. With the economic system in a determined scenario Yanukovych walked away from the EU settlement. The counter-reaction was intense, with giant protests in Kyiv and elsewhere. Yanukovych finally ran away from Kyiv and a pro-Western authorities took over.
One factor led to a different. Putin’s response in March 2014 was to grab Crimea and encourage rebellions in japanese Ukraine, prioritising Ukraine’s dismemberment. Then, via the Minsk agreements, he sought to make use of the Russian-sponsored insurgent enclaves within the Donbas area as levers to affect the Ukrainian authorities and stop it from taking “anti-Russian” positions. It was when that effort failed that he determined, in February 2022, to invade the nation and instal a puppet authorities in Kyiv. And when that additionally failed, he was again to dismemberment, to the purpose that he now refuses to countenance any peace deal that denies him the 4 Ukrainian provinces he’s at the moment attempting to occupy along with Crimea. As this is able to nonetheless depart the non-occupied 80 per cent of the nation deeply hostile to Russia, the first goal has by necessity come again into view. Hopes have revived in Moscow that Ukraine is likely to be so weakened by the lack of US help that Putin can return to its authentic plan and occupy the main cities, together with Kyiv.
As I’ve argued many instances, Russia’s incapability to attain its goals and so win the struggle isn’t the identical as a Ukrainian victory. Ukraine has suffered lots and continues to take action. A ceasefire based mostly on the present traces of contact could be seen in Kyiv as a defeat as a result of it might depart sovereign territory occupied, with these trapped inside topic to harsh measures and “Russification”. However it might hardly be a victory for Russia, which might be left with ruined, depopulated territory, filled with unexploded ordnance, with a demanding inner safety scenario, an extended border to defend, and a hostile authorities in Kyiv working to get into the EU and Nato. For this Russia has sacrificed 1000’s of individuals – useless, wounded and dwelling overseas. Financial exercise and industrial manufacturing is now geared to the struggle effort, with little left for public facilities or productive funding. It has misplaced its European vitality markets, change into a junior accomplice to China, and relies on Iran and North Korea for armaments.
The obsession has led Putin down a path of complete dedication to struggle. He has deserted the pretence that this can be a restricted “particular army operation”. The stakes have continued to be raised. The results of an affiliation settlement with the EU, actually in contrast with every thing that has occurred since, would have been marginal. As soon as a pro-Russian president, who dominated out Nato membership and promised protections for the Russian language, was gone every thing that adopted was sure to be extra hostile. Putin went additional, increase the brand new authorities into one thing really menacing – neo-Nazis and the legatees of the worst strains of Ukrainian nationalism. This was used to justify the annexations and incursions and cyberattacks and financial pressures of 2014 and 2015.
As a result of Kyiv’s defiance was insupportable to Putin, he tried to quell it with a full-scale invasion. When Kyiv remained as defiant as ever, the Ukrainian authorities was subjected to much more evidence-free denunciations, with drug habit and quite a lot of character problems thrown in for good measure. Nonetheless extra defiance and Ukraine was elevated right into a civilisational menace, marked by decadence bordering on paganism. When this was not sufficient, and it grew to become obligatory to elucidate why mighty Russia couldn’t overcome a smaller and inferior energy, the function of Nato, and particularly the US and the UK, was highlighted. And as soon as these had been recognized as the true enemies then the entire battle acquired an existential facet.
All these facets of the Western lifestyle that Putin despises should now be banished from Russia. This goes past crushing political dissent and the propagation of patriotic and militaristic themes, but additionally an assertion of the prevalence of Russian civilisation. These desirous to see the place this has led may seek the advice of a doc launched by the Russian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate, for approval by the World Russian Individuals’s Council in Moscow on 27-28 March. This affirmed that Russia is combating a “holy struggle”. That is offered as an imperialist challenge, to create an expanded homeland for all Russian individuals, together with the sub-groups of Belarussians and Ukrainians, the place their tradition and spirituality will probably be honoured, and in addition as a defensive battle in opposition to the “globalism” and “satanism” that has gripped the West.
Putin goes together with this. He seems to be at one with the Church in its dedication to withstand what’s described because the “worldwide LGBT motion“, and has now been designated as “terroristic”. Crackdowns have begun. This isn’t a brand new theme for Putin. As early as 2013 the Kremlin banned the propaganda of “non-traditional sexual relations amongst minors”. After the full-scale invasion any public reference to LGBT existence grew to become unlawful. The sinister Patriarch Kirill, head of the Orthodox Church and reportedly a former KGB man, has recognized homosexual delight parades in Kyiv as one motive why the invasion was important. Extra gadgets on the record of extremists and terrorists are followers of the late opposition chief Alexei Navalny, Jehovah’s Witnesses and the tech firm Meta.
It’s simple to dismiss this as deranged nonsense however that will be a mistake. It illuminates the ideological underpinnings of Putinism. It takes us distant from makes an attempt to know this struggle as the results of Nato enlargement and the West’s supposedly unreasonable insurance policies which allegedly goaded Russia into in any other case unnaturally aggressive behaviour. The shortcoming to know Putin’s deeply reactionary and obsessive views, together with his idiosyncratic view of historical past, may very well be seen in Tucker Carlson’s growing bewilderment as he tried to interview Putin in early February.
Nonetheless advanced and fanciful this narrative, it has change into sufficiently internalised by the Russian elite and media in order that they will deal with most eventualities. However often one thing occurs that the narrative can’t accommodate, one thing that doesn’t fairly match.
This occurred on 22 March when an assault got here from one other course as Islamist terrorists mounted a horrific assault that left 144 individuals useless, and plenty of extra wounded, as they attended a live performance at Moscow’s Crocus Metropolis Corridor.
The perpetrators had been members of Islamic State-Khorasan (IS-Ok), the group’s Afghanistan and Pakistan arm. Russia has suffered from Islamist terrorism prior to now. This specific group had just lately tried assaults that had been foiled. Nor was there a problem with motive, though Putin sounded perplexed that Russia’s anti-Israel stance over the Gaza struggle hadn’t glad Islamist teams. (Russia, he famous, “stands for a good answer to the escalating Center East battle” as if that will impress radical Islamists.) Motives may very well be discovered going again to the Chechen Wars, Russia’s function combating in opposition to IS and associated teams in Syria and West Africa, and now backing the Taliban in Afghanistan. A variety of Tajiks have been arrested, together with the 4 alleged perpetrators who’ve appeared, exhibiting indicators of beatings and torture, in courtroom. Tajikistan has been a supply of a disproportionate variety of recruits for the struggle and subsequently casualties, and that helps clarify the attraction of Islamism.
Russian authorities had been subsequently conscious of the chance. However the FSB, Russian intelligence service, is stretched. Earlier than 2014 Islamist terrorism had a excessive precedence however now the majority of its exercise is linked to the struggle with Ukraine, in addition to new duties reminiscent of persecuting members of the LGBT neighborhood (recognized as terrorist on the identical day that the assault occurred). Up to now the US, which worries about and watches the identical teams, had handed on warning to Moscow of imminent assaults, for which it was thanked. When it did the identical on 7 March, together with a public warning to US residents to steer clear of concert events, this was derided by Putin as a subversive provocation. (One is reminded of Stalin’s refusal to just accept warning of the potential German invasion in June 1941 as a result of he assumed that his sources had been merely attempting to fire up bother between the Soviet Union and the Nazis.) After the assault the warning was cited within the Russian media as proof that the Individuals had been in on the plot.
When the assault got here the response of the authorities was gradual. Safety forces had been on heightened alert as much as the presidential election on 17 March, together with on the Crocus Metropolis Corridor, however this had been relaxed as soon as Putin’s victory had been proclaimed. That will assist clarify the timing of the assault.
In some way the assault needed to be made to suit with the accepted narrative. Certain sufficient Ukraine was quickly being blamed. The pinnacle of the FSB, Alexander Bortnikov, had warned final October that IS-Ok had greater than 6,500 members and will provoke assaults exterior Afghanistan “within the close to future”. But after the occasion he reported that the assault “was ready by each radical Islamists themselves and, naturally, facilitated by Western particular companies”. Based on this concept, the primary efforts of the CIA and MI6 “are targeted on forming a belt of instability alongside the CIS’s [Commonwealth of Independent States] southern borders. To this finish, fighters hold being recruited from worldwide terrorist organisations working in Iraq, Syria, and another Asian and African international locations and transferred to northern Afghanistan.”
Putin solely spoke up three days after the assault. Then he acknowledged that it had been carried out by “radical Islamists”, however he nonetheless insisted on Ukraine’s doubtless function.
Even after the perpetrators had been arrested and IS had claimed accountability (releasing a grisly video to make their level) there was no wavering. Certainly IS grew to become so irritated by Russia’s try and deny them their triumph that they put out an announcement in considered one of their newspapers, Al-Naba:
“After its resounding defeat, Russia discovered no selection however to direct accusations of collusion in opposition to its opponents within the Western camp to evade admitting its main failure within the face of the mujahideen.”
Extra doubt was placed on Russia’s claims when the Belarussian chief Alexander Lukashenko noticed that the one motive the fleeing terrorists had turned on to a highway in the direction of Ukraine (important proof within the Russian case) was that that they had been diverted away from Belarus, the place that they had been heading, as a result of Lukashenko had simply shut the border at Putin’s behest.
Confronted with perception methods very completely different from one’s personal and factual claims which can be simple to falsify it’s tempting to imagine that every thing is fabricated, that tales contrived to sway the lots are usually not taken critically by these within the know. In any case Putin and his closest cronies grew up on this planet of spies, the place proof and opinions are assumed to be readily manipulable, and this can be a world they’ve by no means actually left. Typically the mendacity may be very clumsy and clear. The FSB even have a transparent curiosity in blaming the West and Ukraine to deflect criticism of their incapability to forestall the assault and cope with it because it unfolded.
But for the Kremlin the mendacity and fakery are within the service of a better reality. They assist reinforce the message that each one Russia’s enemies are in cahoots with one another in order that there actually is a Nazi-Islamist-globalist-satanist axis that colludes in hanging in opposition to Russian civilisation. If that’s the case then each measure obligatory should be taken to alert individuals to the hazard and mobilise them to struggle again. The Ukrainians should be led by Nazis as a result of, regardless of their backgrounds and precise statements, anybody combating Russia should be a Nazi and Russia is at its greatest when battling Nazis as they did from 1941 to 1945.
After contemplating Putin’s assertion blaming Ukraine for the Crocus Metropolis Corridor assault, the historian Tim Snyder got here down on the facet of perception, noting: “That is now not the nimble post-truth Putin who’s able to altering out one lie for an additional as obligatory, with a wink to the insider alongside the best way. This now appears to be a Putin who truly believes what he says – or, in the perfect case, lacks the creativity to react to occasions on this planet.”
There’s an previous sociological maxim (generally known as the Thomas theorem) that if one thing is believed to be actual it’s actual in its penalties. This may also be the case with deliberate lies which can be allowed to substitute for actuality or serve the upper reality embedded within the prevailing ideology. In Soviet instances the authorities had been able to an abrupt flip from one dogmatic place to a different if the previous place had change into inconvenient. Maybe, as Snyder suggests, Putin lacks that form of flexibility. That is why I’ve described him as a strategic fanatic.
The true penalties of Putin’s perception system may very well be seen within the heavy missile strikes in opposition to Ukrainian cities that adopted the Crocus Metropolis Corridor assaults, as if this was someway an applicable retribution (with a few of these doing the firing writing “for Crocus” on the missiles). It is likely to be seen later ought to Putin must justify but extra mobilisation.
But occasions that don’t fairly match with the official narrative can have a disruptive impact. The perpetrators got here from the predominantly Muslim Central Asian nation of Tajikistan. Almost 1,000,000 Tajiks (inhabitants ten million) had been registered in Russia as migrant staff in 2023. As with different teams from Central Asia, they ease the labour shortages attributable to the struggle, each on the entrance traces, the place they die in disproportionate numbers, and within the home economic system. This creates a pressure. The doc launched by the Orthodox Church seemed ahead to Russia quadrupling its inhabitants to 600 million over the subsequent 100 years by encouraging giant households (Putin has designated 2024 the “yr of the household” reflecting demographic worries made worse by the struggle). But the Church additionally opposes permitting in migrants who don’t share Russian values, push down the wages of indigenous individuals, and encourage crime and terrorism.
This can be a common theme of far-right and nationalist teams, and safety companies and police anxious to forestall extra terrorist assaults. Against this the Kremlin, conscious that the migrants are wanted for each the struggle and the economic system, is nervous about the place this may lead, particularly if ethnic tensions get out of hand. The New York Instances quotes a pro-Moscow analyst: “It’s a contradiction. And this terror assault has sharply aggravated this drawback.”
The opposite drawback is that the safety companies are so stretched that they can’t cowl such an enormous vary of disparate enemies. If giant numbers of persons are monitoring social media accounts for proof of perversions and dissidence, then there are fewer preserving a watch out for Islamist exercise. A current article in Overseas Affairs by Timothy Frye, Henry Hale, Ora John Reuter and Bryn Rosenfeld, based mostly on polling, demonstrates the mix of widespread help for Putin and rising struggle fatigue. Even “staunch Putin supporters”, they be aware, “are largely ambivalent in regards to the struggle”.
“Amongst Putin supporters, opposition to the struggle is especially concentrated in teams which can be extra more likely to be recruited for army service and going through economically precarious circumstances… less-educated Putin backers usually tend to oppose persevering with the struggle than their counterparts with superior levels.”
The authors urge that the West conveys the message to Russia that “the financial and army prices of continuous the struggle in Ukraine outweigh the advantages”. They’re conscious of the issue of ousting an autocrat at a time of struggle. Putin has crushed all opposition. But he ought to now fear about “the dissonance” amongst his base.
Putin has no apparent method of bringing this struggle to an finish. As Roderic Lyne famous in a current publish: “The struggle will form Putin’s dying years in energy. He can’t step again from his goal of emasculating Ukraine. He could acquire extra territory, however the Ukrainians won’t ever willingly give up their freedom and sovereignty. Putin has subsequently condemned Russia to an extended struggle, a struggle with no seen finish level, and a battle for years forward with the West in addition to with Ukraine.”
Fairly than on the lookout for methods out of his predicament he has been escalating his rhetoric and accumulating enemies, none of which he is ready to defeat. His place could also be sturdy sufficient to resist all method of setbacks and embarrassments. However occasions nibble away at his authority. Regardless of expectations of progress in opposition to depleted Ukrainian forces, progress on the land struggle continues to be gradual, he’s nonetheless having to take care of occasional incursions into Russian territory by self-proclaimed anti-Putinist militias, together with Ukrainian assaults on the Black Sea fleet and oil refineries. A one-off IS assault will be contorted to slot in with the narrative; a succession of IS assaults could be one other matter.
If ever an argument was wanted in opposition to unchecked autocracy, Putin’s Russia supplies it. Persevering with failure to attain his goals has solely aggravated his fanaticism. The issue isn’t that he’s irrational however the best way that he has framed his Ukraine drawback obliges him to behave in ever extra unreasonable methods, as a result of to do in any other case would require giving in to forces that problem his concept of the Russian nation and what’s stands for. Over a decade he has managed to show an inconvenient facet of Ukraine’s overseas coverage into an existential menace. He’ll stick to a struggle with out finish as a result of he dare not admit that it was folly to launch it within the first place. So the struggle machine should be fed with all obtainable individuals and assets, unbiased and demanding thought should be suppressed, and Ukrainians should be punished for his or her insubordination with ever-more devastation and cruelty.
Lawrence Freedman is a daily contributor to the New Statesman. This piece initially ran on his Substack “Remark is Freed“.
[See also: Wagner’s next act in Africa]