Intel has denied a report saying that it’s asking its motherboard companions to implement decrease, “baseline” energy profiles to resolve instability points and probably nerf efficiency in its Thirteenth- and 14th-gen Core processors..
As a substitute, it’s the other: “Intel isn’t recommending motherboard producers to make use of ‘baseline’ energy supply settings on boards able to greater values,” an Intel spokesman stated in an e-mail. However the firm is asking motherboard distributors to incorporate a brand new Intel Default Settings BIOS choice tuned for stability, which we’re already seeing roll out within the whereas — it’s simply totally different from the “baseline” energy profiles initially rushed out. The main points matter.
This text was first revealed on Could 9, however has been up to date to say MSI’s new Intel Default Settings BIOS under.
Many experiences have bubbled up that Intel’s Thirteenth- and 14th-generation Core chips have suffered from instability, with customers experiencing crashes and Blue Screens of Loss of life (BSODs) when enjoying video games. Intel hasn’t stated what number of processors have been affected or beneath what situations the instability could happen, though a leaked memo seems accountable motherboard producers and their selection of turning off of security options. That very same memo signifies Intel plans a extra consumer-focused assertion in Could.
PCWorld requested for a proof of what was happening in response to experiences that Intel was supposedly going to implement extra stringent restrictions on turbo (PL2) clock speeds, which might successfully rob them of efficiency. Motherboard makers had been reportedly being instructed that Intel would implement “baseline” settings. As PC Gamer famous, Asus was one of many motherboard producers to launch an up to date BIOS with an “Intel Baseline Profile” — however found that the facility limits that Asus was implementing went means over these inventory or “baseline” speeds.
Including to the confusion and hand-wringing was Gigabyte’s implementation of a baseline profile that differed from others that drastically lowered the efficiency of the CPUs by as a lot as 30 % and likewise appeared to make use of extreme voltage as nicely. Gigabyte had touted the brand new Intel baseline profile in a press launch–however has appeared to have pulled it now.
Intel is refusing to set “baseline” profiles
It’s unclear whether or not Intel’s assertion is designed to not directly deal with how Asus carried out the “baseline” profile, or in the event that they merely don’t apply to Intel’s Core i9-13900K/KF and Core i9-14900K/KF processors as a substitute. However Intel stated a “baseline” profile doesn’t apply to its quickest chips.
“A number of motherboard producers have launched BIOS profiles labeled ‘Intel Baseline Profile’,” Intel stated in an announcement. “Nonetheless, these BIOS profiles aren’t the identical because the ‘Intel Default Settings’ suggestions that Intel has just lately shared with its companions concerning the instability points reported on Thirteenth and 14th gen Ok SKU processors.
“These ‘Intel Baseline Profile’ BIOS settings seem like based mostly on energy supply steering beforehand supplied by Intel to producers describing the assorted energy supply choices for Thirteenth and 14th Era Ok SKU processors based mostly on motherboard capabilities,” Intel added. “Intel isn’t recommending motherboard producers to make use of ‘baseline’ energy supply settings on boards able to greater values.”
Put one other means, Intel stated that “baseline” energy supply profiles aren’t advisable for its Thirteenth- and 14th-gen Ok-series processors.
Intel is limiting PL2 values on the Core i9-13900K/KF and the Core i9-14900K/KF to 253W on each the “Efficiency” and “Excessive” profiles, Intel stated. On the Core i9-13900KS and Core i9-14900KS, PL2 ranges are set at 253W for the “Efficiency” and 320W for the “Excessive” Profile. Intel can be putting limits on ICCMAX energy, “by no means” exceeding 400A at most.
“Intel’s advisable ‘Intel Default Settings’ are a mix of thermal and energy supply options together with a choice of doable energy supply profiles based mostly on motherboard capabilities,” Intel goes on. “Intel recommends clients to implement the best energy supply profile suitable with every particular person motherboard design as famous within the desk under.”
IDG by way of Intel
Intel doesn’t appear to be specifying which implementations should use the Efficiency profile, and which use the Excessive profile. However it at the very least is a sign that Intel is working towards an answer. Falcon Northwest has additionally revealed a workaround, which it characterised as a “work in progress.”
Replace: Simply two days after Intel issued this assertion to press, MSI has already issued new motherboard BIOS containing Intel Default Settings because the default choice, together with new Energy Restrict settings tied as to if you utilize an air tower cooler or a liquid cooler.
We’ve requested Intel in the event that they perceive the scope of the issue, and the way (or if) RMA or guarantee returns shall be affected, and whether or not the corporate has seen instability on the Efficiency and Excessive settings. We’ll replace this story if and after we be taught extra.